Until then the saga cannot begin, or end for you. The author has lived the tale first hand, and is certain this act is unlike any dirty laundry you have ever encountered. All is the truth, captivating the interest of the reader purely by astonishment. This is one of those stories which appear so outrageous as to be unbelievable, unless of course presented in due course with factual certainty.

Prepare yourself to be skeptical I implore, for one may be missing something fundamental if they don't, sooner or later, ask how could such things have been possible. Should the answers not be immediately evident, chances are you need to read deeper or mine further. Do not be surprised if the mysteries created in one chapter, are solved in another. In turn puzzles mastered collectively may well create yet a larger conundrum. After all, this exhibit is intended to instill a wanton desire for satisfaction, given by way of the sword of truth. It is likely best to keep a journal recording your queries, referencing your thoughts when conviction has ultimately culminated for you.

This book has been waiting a closing passage since 1979, the bureaucracy inhibiting truth in the interest of attempting to avoid exposure and subversion of it's tainted institutions and or it's officers. Please support this petition in the name of the people's rights, regarding freedom of information and privacy, not the Act, as the Act is governed not by the "people" but the said failing bureaucracy, all the while the Commissioner flatly admitting the short falls of the Acts intended purpose. These obversions have been documented for each facet of this book, however, the meat has remained in a deep freeze since before 1967, by order of the Supreme Court. Exacting this proof is the pudding, but as the saying goes... if you don't eat your meat, how can you have any pudding? Upon freeing the necessary data, each of the chapters poems will reveal their underlying meanings, each essentially being a summary of astounding facts and practices to be truthfully unfolded in full detail.

Denied access to your personal information, a result of cover up tactics initiated by a tainted system? Add your name to this petition, demanding justice and public accountability in Canada. For all intense purposes, please include your City of residence and the Institution entrusted with the care of your information, as well briefly outline the circumstances of the illegitimate dissemination.

Name......................Institution.................................................Illegitimacy

Pinko Palino..............Albany Region Children?s Aid Society...........Coercion & False Representation

Rev. Anonymous.......PigRoast Region Children?s Aid Society......False Representation. ect.

Anonymous2.............Concerned Citizen.
 

name................................institution........................illegitimacy.......................city

yes I have completed the petition and I'm interested in chapter1 ........................................ please email or address my instructions to

(Confidentiality Will Be Respected upon your request. )

Thank you for your participation.

For your added convenience and direct voice, please FAX the FEDS directly through: http://www.net-efx.com/faxfeds/ (Municipal accesses can also be found here.)

Pinko feels Casa Columbo needs a wing dedicated to instucting and protecting the people's right not only to their information, but also to give of it unsupressed and without duress regardless of age race or circomestance.

The following excerpt taken from the chronicles, represents a synopsis of several terms of political office, ten years of run arounds, no less than $300,000.00 of tax payers money and zero satisfaction. Apparently the buck was skillfully stopped here succesfully, the commisioner obsolving his responsability and the chairman of the board simply refusing to correspond in any way shape or form.

• Information and Privacy Commissioner
• Meeting, Pigeon..
• .
• Chair of the Management Board
• Meeting, Pigeon..

Dear Sirs

Received on this date is the enclosed dated Jan. 25,1989, from the Children?s Aid of Albany. As is clear in that response regarding my formal request for case notes, access has been denied in that the office is not governed under the Act.

Also is a perpetual presumption on behalf of the C.A.S., supporting initial findings of the court, which were ultimately invalid and overturned in the subsequent Supreme Court Appeal. Omission of the appeal has been very thorough in that the atrocities imposed on the family throughout the original case were deframental to the ?society?. In so having then been in the greater public interest to preserve the image of the Society, the later dealings were entirely sealed from view with an obscured Court Order. It is my belief the intricacies entailed for the lifting of the courts sealing are improperly coveted within this same C.A.S. realm. It is unfathomable this sealing order was purposeful of enabling a continuation of the vary prejudice having originally warranted the said Order?s usefulness.

In retrospect, to peruse the provided news excerpts from the age in question, even the top C.A.S. spokesman states, as do our relevant key facts indicate, procedures as being inadequate beyond a doubt. Clearly too is that the service had savored funds with the means of a high rate of adoption. Our request for sanctuary (protection) coincidentally enough, was somehow met with a judgment and adoption procedures under the Child Welfare Act, rather than addressing the root problem adequately and granting the required but stated unavailably fundable shelter, necessary to get our house in order.

There were also other sources of retreat available to us such as friends and neighbors, and so with this option being unacceptable and refused, was the first in a series of injustices commenced of C.A.S. enpowerment. Consistently, not at any time was it afforded the situation the truth of the matter, being that the present ?monsters? in our household had been accountable for the families conditions, and present of the poisoning of my fathers body and mind in an attempt to destroy our family unit. Why?, I can?t say, however none the less it remains typical of the prejudice of the times, and the underhanded methods which implemented the duress of conditions imposed on us infinitely, until the youngest child were to become of age in so removing C.A.S. jurisdiction and control. We almost made it to this suggested point of no return, but Fathers suspicious and untimely demise was six months previous an end of any controls.

I am untrusting of C.A.S., as is a persons prerogative. For whatever reason I question the motives of the C.A.S., and should not be placed at the mercy of the people to which are not my representatives. There is no justice visible before this empowered authority to control the destiny or facts, concerning any individuals personal involvement?s, regardless of any disguises in place. The dealings of the issue had then formed brand-new contingency procedures to be followed, forms to be secured, and laws to protect ?the people? from any disregard of the basic rights over looked us, prior the Crown involvement such as it was. Apparently these controls had not been enough as per today?s discriminating of ones rights, to accessing his or her own personally related information, in the aftermath of family tragedy.

Imposing this charge is a serious breach of justice as follows. Regardless of what institution is in the care and control of sensitive information?s responsive to public bodies, accountability to the public body to which the information relates is essential to the integrity of any and all contained contents.

As far as the C.A.S. not being bound by the Act, well this is preposterous. Previous dealings have briefed me in the Act, and the Legislative Assemblies efforts within sec.55,1988. Firstly here there is reference to notes as being a valid part of legislative dealings, accompanied with language fitting the issue there of the related notes. Secondly is the lack of the addressed extend coverage of the Act to such as the named C.A.S. information bank. Third is the failure of applying these two mentioned articles to full functional potential of the given design. Combined together this forms a breach of public trust and accountability where it is again no doubt due.

Yet this mere ungoverned organization/institution as determined, continues in proceeding to have created and now cloaks a ?sensitive personal type record?, dispersing only what they consider, as in their view or interest as safe extracted segments of the entire record, to or from government facilities. Incidentally, are these government facilities not of an eminent stature, or is it as this correspondence entails and apparently the provisions offered are pointlessly present to ultimately protect the sum of the addressed information that might never be committed.

In other words the total of this controlled information dose not necessarily reach the proper government care and custody, because the collector of the extremely sensitive information, may or may not receive a certain percentage of funding from the government. Therefor the said compiling office is exempted of any public accountability, defeating the protection and well-being of the interests to the parties recorded in the file. Woh! Is Big Brother Watching you too?

The contents with held were valid enough to be presented and accepted in the court as evidence and testimony. With the contained data being consequential in whatever deemed capacity, to the best interests to whom the information relates, I submit to you that the basic rights are again being forsaken ironically by the process designed to protect the same. This overbearing power instilled, in all honesty, an unmarshaled group is astounding.

Enclosed for your information, please find correspondence addressing my endeavors with C.A.S., as well through the government where failure to produce documentation in full has also been sighted. This catch 22 is unacceptable and I await your response of recognition and direction at your earliest convenience. Thank you

• Yours truly

• Cartseat Tantamount
• *****************
• **************
• *******

Ombudsman Meeting, Pigeon

Human Rights Board Meeting, Pigeon

Law Society of Upper Canada. Meeting, Pigeon

The Information and Privacy Commissioner responds as follows...

March 13, 1989

Dear ********

Your letter dated February 6, 1989 was received by my office on February 20, 1989. I note that you also sent a copy of your letter to the Chair of the Management Board.

As you correctly point, children's aid societies are not covered by the Ontario freedom of information and privacy legislation. My office has recommended that this be changed and I would like to share with you what we have done in this regard.

Last year, the standing committee on the Legislative Assembly undertook a review of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (theAct). In January 1988, my office made a submission to the standing committee and stated:

• There are a number of public bodies carrying out important public functions which are not currently covered by the Acts. For example, agencies such as hospitals, universities, and social service agencies are not currently covered by the Acts, but they receive public funds and carry out a public function...
• .. If coverage of the Acts. were extended to these bodies, it would make more information publicly available and enhance public accountability. In addition. it would ensure that privacy protection is available for the personal information collected by these bodies. Accordingly, the Acts should be amended to extend coverage to other government bodies.

• ...that coverage of the province's freedom of information and protection of privacy statues be extended to hospitals, universities, social service agencies and other public bodies that are receiving significant public funding or performing public functions but are not currently covered by the legislation...

• ...the committee recommends extending coverage of the Acts to various bodies that receive significant public funding or perform public functions...
• I urge you to bring forward amendments to the Acts as quickly as possible...

Thank you for sharing your concerns on this issue with my office.

Sincerly,

Cat ScaT

Commissioner